Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 18:47

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Nintendo Switch update 20.1.1 out now, patch notes - Nintendo Everything
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
New model helps to figure out which distant planets may host life - Phys.org
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What are some difficulties in a JEE aspirant's life?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Massive Dinosaur ‘Dance-Off’ Arena Discovered in Colorado - The Daily Galaxy
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Nintendo Switch 2 Launch Week Restocks - Here's What We Know So Far - GameSpot
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The FCC is cracking down on EchoStar’s deployment of 5G. - The Verge
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What is the most inappropriate experience you have had with a friend's daughter?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.